Re: compile-file return values?

Raymond Toy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.cmucl.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Douglas" == Douglas Crosher <[email protected]> writes:

    Douglas> While check the ASDF 2 tests it appears that CMUCL may
    Douglas> not be returning the expected value for the second return
    Douglas> value of 'compile-file.  The standard appears to state
    Douglas> that the second value should be true if there are
    Douglas> style-warnings, warnings, or errors. However CMUCL
    Douglas> ignores style-warnings.  This appears to be a regression,
    Douglas> as it had been: (not (null error-severity))

Hi Douglas!  

Thanks for the note.  Can you tell me which asdf2 test complains about
this.  

A check of the commit logs doesn't provide any information about why
this was changed. (It happened when adding support for package locks.)

Ray

_______________________________________________
cmucl-imp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zs64.net/mailman/listinfo/cmucl-imp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.