Re: compile-file return values?
Raymond Toy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cmucl.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Douglas" == Douglas Crosher <[email protected]> writes: Douglas> While check the ASDF 2 tests it appears that CMUCL may Douglas> not be returning the expected value for the second return Douglas> value of 'compile-file. The standard appears to state Douglas> that the second value should be true if there are Douglas> style-warnings, warnings, or errors. However CMUCL Douglas> ignores style-warnings. This appears to be a regression, Douglas> as it had been: (not (null error-severity)) Hi Douglas! Thanks for the note. Can you tell me which asdf2 test complains about this. A check of the commit logs doesn't provide any information about why this was changed. (It happened when adding support for package locks.) Ray _______________________________________________ cmucl-imp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zs64.net/mailman/listinfo/cmucl-imp