Re: Eval issue

Raymond Toy <[email protected]> Sat, 29 Aug 2015 15:14:37 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.lisp.cmucl.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

>>>>> "Stas" == Stas Boukarev <[email protected]> writes:

    Stas> Blake McBride <[email protected]> writes:
    >> (setq x 33)
    >> 
    >> (let ((x 44))
    >> (eval '(print x))
    >> nil)
    >> 
    >> SBCL, CCL, CLISP, ABCL, ECL, GCL, MKCL all print 33.
    >> 
    >> CMUCL prints 44.
    >> 
    >> The spec is confusing to me.  Which should it be?
    Stas> Whichever. The consequences of (setq x 33) are undefined.

And for the record, cmucl implicitly declares x to be special.  Cmucl
should have printed a message to that effect too.

--
Ray

_______________________________________________
cmucl-imp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zs64.net/mailman/listinfo/cmucl-imp