Re: Compiling files with traditional Mac EOL in CMUCL

OK, sorry, I carefully checked again. SBCL also doesn't support compiling
files with Mac EOLs.  Clozure CL, which I confirmed now, indeed support Mac
EOLs.

For the reason I can't convert the source files to UNIX line endings,
there's a Lisp function for parsing (multi-line) literal strings defined in
source files with MAC line endings.  It seems that, #\Newline was mapped to
"\r" in MCL, thus Lisp forms like (position #\Newline string) doesn't work
in MCL for other line endings, especially the UNIX endings, because in this
case there would be no #\Newline in the string at all!

Of course, by carefully adjusting the source code there must be a way to
make the code works in both MCL and SBCL/CMUCL with UNIX line endings, but
I don't want to do such modifications unless necessary.

There's another workaround solution: if I convert all comments to closed
forms: #| ... |#, everything is fine again, but this again changed too much
in the original code, not what I wanted.

But if there's a small patch to let SBCL/CMUCL recognize '\r' as line
separators, it would be the best for me (or others who met the same issue,
while I highly doubt there would be anyone).

Regards,

Chun Tian


On 6 September 2017 at 13:59, Robert Swindells <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Chun Tian (binghe)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >I'm surprised that CMUCL doesn't support lisp files with traditional Mac
> >EOL, that is, lines are separated by a single '\r', there's no `\n` at
> all.
> >
> >Here is my recent story: I'm porting some old Lisp code originally
> >developed in Macintosh Common Lisp 4.2. All files use Mac EOL. I can't
> >convert them to Unix EOL, because that will break some Lisp functions in
> >MCL.  The problem when compiling these files in CMUCL is, if there's a
> >line-based comment starting with semicolon ";", CMUCL compiler will
> >consider all the rest code in the file is at the "same" line, thus they're
> >all commented!  It looks like CMUCL has correctly compiled the file
> >(because there's no warning at all), but actually it compiled almost
> >nothing.
> >
> >SBCL and LispWorks have no such issues, I can imagine Clozure CL must
> >natively support Mac EOL.
>
> Are you sure that SBCL is doing what you want ? The definitions of
> read-comment look very similar in CMUCL and SBCL.
>
> I also don't understand why you can't convert the source files to UNIX
> line endings.
>
>
>


-- 
Chun Tian (binghe)
University of Bologna (Italy)
_______________________________________________
cmucl-imp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.zs64.net/mailman/listinfo/cmucl-imp