Re: qcmu (was: Attaching to a running CMUCL process)

   > PS.  I was looking over the recent thread mentioned in parentheses in
   > the subject line -- I too am interested in attaching to running CMUCL
   > processes.  I'd be curious to know whether Denis Papathanasiou was
   > satisfied by the lispserver info (if he's reading this).

   In the end, I wound up using detachtty/attachtty for this (i.e. invoke
   the process under detachtty, accessing the REPL using attachtty when
   necessary) and it really works well.

My interest is in creating a MUD-like environment with distinct users
interacting with the same LISP process, so I don't think this approach
would work for me.