Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, not quite there

Carl Shapiro wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Raymond Toy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Sounds great!  Do you think those changes will be available for the release?
> 
> Sure.  I think it is important that these changes go into the release
> for 19e to be generally useful.

Great.  19e will wait until these things go in.

> 
>> I also found another, simpler, way of causing the error.  Using a new
>> build (skipping over the errors from the libraries), just press C-c in
>> the repl.  Then enter 0 to select the continue restart.  You get a segv
>> at address 0.
> 
> Is this also on the FC9 machine?
> 
Yes.  I'm pretty sure it works on older OSes.  I don't recall ever 
seeing this on my Suse 9 or 10.3 box.

Ray