Re: Another spurious compilation diagnostic?

At 13 KLoC, it's a bit unwieldily.  But I hope to release the whole  
source soon (ca. 1-2 months).  There will lots of fun then.


On Sep 24, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Raymond Toy wrote:

> Steven Edwards wrote:
>> Thank you for your assistance.
>>
>> It looks like you are correct.  However, while the compiler may be
>> smart, it's not smart enough to see that there's a secondary guard
>> variable that prevents any access of the list-length result if the
>> argument is nil.  The same goes for the when evaluation.
>
> It would be useful if you could extract that part out for us to look  
> at.
> Perhaps there's a bug in the compiler.