Re: Compiling macros with an optional function parameter?

Raymond Toy wrote:
> I think you should change #'string-equal to 'string-equal.

That won't compile b/c the macro-expansion doesn't come out right (it
winds up as ":test string-equal" instead of ":test #'string-equal").

Note that the macro as originally written *does* work, both in
interpreted and compiled forms.

It's just when I try to cat the x86f file into another one (I'm creating
a single x86f file composed of different macros & functions), that
concatenation won't work.