Re: Another spurious compilation diagnostic?
Steven Edwards <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cmucl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well, it may have been over 32 KB; I'm not sure. In any case, only the first 1,024 bytes (or so) made it in. The expression: (read-line (cpc-stin cpc) nil nil) Where (cpc-stin cpc) was explicitly set to *terminal-io*, and the input is being done from a terminal. It looks like every input test with less than about 1 KB works okay. == Steven On Sep 24, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Raymond Toy wrote: > Steven Edwards wrote: >> Oh, and one more thing: It looks like read-line has a 1,024 character >> line length limit. This isn't so bad, but it also appears to >> sometimes >> hang when presented with some 30 KB of no-newline text at a time. > > There used to be some limit like this but it was fixed long ago. I > can't reproduce this. Can you give an example of this failure? I > created a file with 30000 characters and a new line. read-line > reads in > this line without problems.