Re: Another spurious compilation diagnostic?

Madhu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.cmucl.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Steven Edwards <[email protected]> :
Wrote on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:05:22 -0400:

| Well, it may have been over 32 KB; I'm not sure.  In any case, only
| the first 1,024 bytes (or so) made it in.
|
| The expression:
|
|   (read-line (cpc-stin cpc) nil nil)
|
| Where (cpc-stin cpc) was explicitly set to *terminal-io*, and the
| input is being done from a terminal.
|
| It looks like every input test with less than about 1 KB works okay.


Were you pasting text via X (say by pasting the primary selection
through a mouseclick to CMUCL running in a  terminal?)

I'm asking to check if there are limits involved before cmucl gets to
the text

With cmucl running in an xterm I seem to have a  4k limit on the size of
the string I can paste to the repl which is running 
(read-line t nil nil)

--
Madhu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.