Re: CMUCL 18c building on tru64 5.1

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Fausto Saporito <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 2014-09-04 5:04 GMT+02:00 Raymond Toy <[email protected]>:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> and in binary is : 110000001010010100100001001001
> >>
> >> so the address is valid (least 3 bits are 001).
> >
> >
> > That seems reasonable. And it's somewhere near the beginning of the
> > DYNAMIC_0_SPACE_START, which is correct too.
>
> So maybe the problem is in alpha-assem.S
> We have 18a for DU4 working (I suppose should mean Digital Unix 4),
> I'm using Tru64 5.1b
> Maybe those alpha-assem.s needs to be modified for the newer version...
>

​Possibly. If the ABI changed for if some registers are now reserved but
weren't before, then yes, you'll have to update alpha-assem.s.

But your debugger should be able to tell you exactly where the signal 11 is
happening.  What instruction? Do the operands look right?  Finding and
fixing that will probably go a long way.​


>
> I'll try to recover Tru64 4.0f and check if all is fine with it.
>
> Fausto
>
_______________________________________________
cmucl-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zs64.net/mailman/listinfo/cmucl-help