Re: help a newbee to start cmucl
Bharat Shetty <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2015 01:25:19 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.cmucl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+6VBw7LgEbA9PYi34hcHRk_nLbjLywtJYYn6y31kX2fWGvmCw@mail.gmail.com> |
Many thanks for the reply. I think I had updated slime recently. I started trying hemlock about a week back after i ran into asdf issues with slime/emacs. Otherwise I am not particular about hemlock - actually comfortable with emacs/slime. Perhaps I will try an older version of slime and see. Regards, Bharat On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:18 AM, GP lisper <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:27:21 +0530 > > From: Bharat Shetty <[email protected]> > > > > worked with the bundled slime/emacs. Recently I started getting > > DIVISION-BY-ZERO (operands 99 and 0 ) while slime loads asdf. Could not > > Did you (or automated) update slime? It can be tricky, as slime > coders marginalize cmucl users. I stuck with older versions of slime > and would only occaisonally test (with easy reversion) a newer slime. > > > > a lot of logs generated in the console. I have lesstif installed on the > > remove it, lesstif is not fully compatible and has problems with other > applications. Actual motif is available nowdays, best to use it. > > > > Any help with getting back with cmucl on emacs/hemlock is welcome. > > When I started cmucl, I also spent time trying to get the old tools > such as hemlock working. It never worked, and eventually I realized I > had no need for it. > > If you had it working in some distro/release, and hemlock is > important, why did you change the distro?? > > -- > A bad day in () is better than a good day in {} > _______________________________________________ cmucl-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zs64.net/mailman/listinfo/cmucl-help