Re: Trial stitching of mailing list histories at https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/
Anton Vodonosov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Erik, thank you very much for this work. I noticed small difference in capitalization of mailing list name: Compare: https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-plus-ssl-devel/2014-April/000000.html https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-plus-ssl-devel/2014-April/000249.html Your new mailman-test archive does better job whey it says "More information about the cl-plus-ssl-devel mailing list", while current version says "More information about the Cl-plus-ssl-devel mailing list" - capitalized list name. Interesting, that both versions use capitalized list name in another phrase: "Previous message: [Cl-plus-ssl-devel]..." If we check some elder messages, for example https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-plus-ssl-devel/2014-January/000248.html the list name is lower case everywhere. I don't see other problems (although I don't have good ideas how to verify the archive). Best regards, - Anton 06.04.2015, 11:17, "Erik Huelsmann" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > Last night I have finished my scripts which stitch the mailing list history from the old common-lisp.net system's mailman, the mlmmj and the new mailman archives. > > The result is hosted here:б═https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ > > I'd greatly appreciate review of the result in order to be able to fix any issues before we do the final conversion run. Comments can be posted here. > > If you find spam when going through the archives, please let me know, because since we're re-generating the mailing list archives, now is a good time to remove it. > > Regards, > > -- > Bye, > > Erik. > > http://efficito.comб═-- Hosted accounting and ERP. > Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.