Re: Progress on stitching mailing list history back together
Mark Evenson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2015/4/8 12:13, Erik Huelsmann wrote: > Hi Mark, all, > > No problem. The archives have been offline for so long a week or two >> doesn't make all that much difference. >> >> It would be nice to be able to announce on ELS that they're finally >> stitched and back though. Hope that's a timeline you can support when you >> look at it more closely on Thursday. >> > > Been searching around for documentation regarding > non-time-sequentially-ordered mailman archives. My reading of > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-April/056687.html is > that we can add the missing posts any time and simply need to regenerated > the entire archive when we do. > > That being the case, I think I should restore the mailing list archives and > when we get to it, we can add the missing mails to the armedbear-devel > list's archive. That would remove the pressure off of you to come up with > the missing mails asap. > > Would that work for you? Not sure what you are suggesting other than wait until my full archive is available… In any case, I finally got enough bandwidth [to upload my IMAP archives as Thunderbird had them on my local disk][1]. Slice 'n dice at will; or tell me the format that you need to process. I assume [mbox][2] would be the natural choice, probably stripping out the delivery headers. [1]: https://common-lisp.net/user/mevenson/armedbear-devel.gz [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbox -- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare to it now."