Re: Time to consolidate static project pages into GitLab?
Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Vladimir, I personally dislike github (although I use it) and had a very old SF account which I use sparingly. Alas, during the c-l.net “loss of usability” period, I moved two repositories to SF and I plan to move them to c-l.net as soon as I find some time to do it (it may be a long time, but that’s just me :) ). Marco > On May 9, 2017, at 22:16 , Vladimir Sedach <[email protected]> wrote: > > SourceForge is a very good example of why common-lisp.net should > continue to provide repository hosting and you should host your > projects' official repositories on c-l.net and encourage others to do > the same. > > In 2013 SourceForge was acquired by Dice Holdings, who proceeded to do > things like infect downloadable binaries with spyware and adware. > Fortunately for SourceForge users it was again sold to another > company in 2016 who stopped the adware. For now. > > I made the mistake of moving some of my projects' official repositories > to github in 2012, and plan to move them back to c-l.net this year. You > can always use github as another remote and get the benefits of their > pull request interface. > > In the long run having a non-profit entity like common-lisp.net provide > Free Software hosting is a lot less work than dealing with "free" > accounts from for-profit corporations that can modify or take away the > service at any time (Google Code is a good example here). > > Vladimir > > Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]> writes: > >> I am not that happy about github (or sf.net or whatever). >> >> I don’t like the github “one-size-fits-all” basic setup (sf.net is better in that respect). >> >> My preference would be to keep c-l.net as is; however, I am not doing much work about it :) >> >> Cheers >> — >> MA >> >> >> >>> On May 7, 2017, at 07:32 , Raymond Toy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> If there's no code hosting, then what is the purpose of c-l.net? Without the repositories, that only leaves the mailing lists and a few other random things, I think. >>> >>> I am grateful for everything that c-l.net provides. Otherwise, I'd have to host them myself or find some other means of hosting everything else except the repos (for which there are many alternatives). >>> >>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Anton Vodonosov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Several more words. >>> >>> For many projects github pages might be enough. Also, code hosting can be done on github . Maybe we should encourage this to free cl.net supporters from maintenance of code hosting? >>> >>> >>> >>> 06.05.2017, 13:15, "Erik Huelsmann" <[email protected]>: >>>> Hi Daniel, Anton, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your reactions. That's enough to decide not to change our ways. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Erik. >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Kochmański <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Same goes for me, I host various static files on both ECL and McCLIM >>>> projects (documentation, papers, in case of ECL - releases). >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> Anton Vodonosov writes: >>>> >>>>> In cl-test-grid I store reports as static files on cl.net. Not sure it's possible with gitlab pages. >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> - Anton >>>>> 06.05.2017, 01:30, "Erik Huelsmann" <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> Since the inception of Common-Lisp.net, we have offered projects the option to log in on the host through ssh connections to manage their >>>>> hosted project pages (https://common-lisp.net/project/*). >>>>> As off December 2016, GitLab - the software we use to provide the majority of the repositories on the site - includes a hosting offer for >>>>> static pages: https://about.gitlab.com/2016/12/24/were-bringing-gitlab-pages-to-community-edition/ >>>>> I've not studied the functionality in depth, but I'm wondering: would the time have come to start moving the project pages into GitLab by >>>>> using this offering and start moving away from having OS-based accounts? >>>>> Would people mind or even like to move to this functionality? >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Bye, >>>>> Erik. >>>>> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. >>>>> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Kochmański ;; aka jackdaniel | Przemyśl, Poland >>>> TurtleWare - Daniel Kochmański | www.turtleware.eu >>>> >>>> "Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bye, >>>> >>>> Erik. >>>> >>>> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. >>>> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ray -- Marco Antoniotti