Re: 2018 Site Redesign Proposal
Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACOoB6hTUX0jNi=rPWo=yraaaQ4UbFCE=sG_QEDP9pBOSiPGjw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Cheryl, Mark, On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Mark Evenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 1, 2018, at 01:08, Cheryl Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, long time no talk! > > > > I hope everyone has been well. I've had... a hectic time of it but I'm > settling down finally. > > > > I should apologize for how MIA and hard-to-reach I have been. > > Hopefully now that things are more stable in my personal life, I can > give more time to CL and other projects. > > > > As a start, I've written a basic design update for Common-Lisp.net. You > can view and comment on the code for it here: https://gitlab.common-lisp. > net/clo/site/merge_requests/1 > > > > This features actual mobile responsiveness (yes, the last design had an > embarrassing mistake, I know!) and removes the mtime dependency that was > preventing us from upgrading Ruby on CLnet's servers. I think we're still > on a very old Ruby version, hopefully this will allow us to upgrade it, or > at least remove one more barrier. > > > > Please take your time to review it at your leisure; I know I'm sort of > surprising everyone with this. > > I've attached a few screenshots so you can see what it looks like at a > glance. > > > > Thank you, > > - C. Yang > > I thought the plan was to port the current site over to a non-Ruby version > in https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/clo/cl-site and then change that one? > > It would be considerably easier for the operators to get rid of the Ruby > dependency. > Indeed for me it is a higher priority to remove the Ruby dependency and be able to generate the site from Lisp than it is to have a new site. -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.