Re: [missing implementations]
Tim Plotnikov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1bedd6f3-856c-40ae-8fee-7b8f1093c304@Spark> |
Hi Dave, I can play around colors and font size within the current theme (bootstrap simplex). I just need an account for me on gitlab.common-lisp.net. Best Regards, Tim Plotnikov 11 окт. 2018 г., 18:02 +0300, Dave Cooper <[email protected]>, писал: > > Hi Daniel, > > Franz is paying an annual fee for a "sponsored link" for Allegro CL (which will help us defray out-of-pocket hosting expenses), and with their payment they requested to be "first to the party" for a short while at least in terms of sponsored links on the site. > > In the meantime I agree that LispWorks certainly belongs with a listing of implementations, but we would have to hold back the "Sponsored Link" status for the time being. > > I suggest listing them on the /implementations page but leaving Allegro by itself on the downloads/ ("Get Started") page for the next couple months. > > Other viable implementations such as clisp should also be listed as well. How about also MKCL, the current attempt at resurrecting Corman in 64-bit, Open Genera... (I guess Scieneer is inactive these days)... I know we are pointing to Wikipedia as a fallback so maybe we don't have to be listing every single conceivable implementation here. Where do we draw the line is the question. > > Mariano, would you like to have a go at making these updates? > > > Dave > > P.S. The main negative feedback I've seen on reddit and HN has to do with the color scheme. The red bar at the top has been mistaken for a browser warning regarding visiting the site. The font size has also been described as too small (they are comparing with lisp-lang.org). Do we have any opinions on this? Anyone want to have a play with layout_2018.css? > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:32 AM Daniel Kochmański <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > new website is great. There are though a few suprises: > > > > > > - clisp and lispworks are not listed in Resources -> Common Lisp > > > Implementations > > > > > > - lispworks is not listed on getting started download page, but allegro > > > is (since two free implementations are listed, it would be justified to > > > mention two most popular commercial ones) > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Daniel > > > > > > -- > My Best, > > Dave Cooper, [email protected] > genworks.com, gendl.org > +1 248-330-2979 >