Re: Outage of gitlab.common-lisp.net
Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG0Nw2=2bKmm4faZBOFwMbcVomYc=epc4-h30Y0m=ChUcOdy0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Dear Erik, As we say in Italy (pardon the translation): Fortune is blind, but Jinx has a 20/20 vision, and usually aims straight. Thank you for all the work you all are doing. All the best Marco On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 12:56 AM Raymond Toy <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like a series of unfortunate events. > > Thanks for your hard work in getting this all back up again. > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:18 AM Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> common-lisp.net GitLab instance is set to maintenance mode since last >> night due to unexpected outage: around 19.20 CEST, phoe approached me on >> the common-lisp.net:matrix.org chat channel (a.k.a. #common-lisp.net:libera.chat) >> about the unavailability of the with-contexts project. Logging into the >> system, it quickly became apparent that one of the discs had filled up, >> causing this failure. After a bit of research, it became apparent that some >> 23GB (less than 10% of space on the volume) of disc space was taken by >> Prometheus. A tool we're not using, but which comes out of the box with >> GitLab. Disabling Prometheus and removing its files quickly freed up enough >> space for basic web requests to work again. >> To have some more room for various processes to operate with, I'm using a >> maximum of 80% fill-rate for the volumes in the VM. So, I went looking for >> more possibilities to clean out storage. At one point, I ended up GitLab's >> PostgreSQL directory, where there was a little more than a GB of storage to >> be won. Not a lot, but since I was cleaning anyway, it seemed like a good >> thing to look at. There were clearly old Pg clusters (various Pg10 and Pg11 >> clusters while we were running on 12). There also was a script called >> "delete_old_clusters.sh". It seemed better to use a script from the vendor >> than meddling with the database data myself, so I used it. HOWEVER: it >> immediately and without warning *removed the production database* (contrary >> to the expectation that it would remove the *old* clusters laying around)! >> Although this is rather unfortunate, series of events, I quickly >> recovered from the heart attack that followed; turned off as many services >> on the machine as possible and searched (a) for older database copies and >> (b) for dumped backups. Unfortunately, misforture never comes alone: as >> soon as I found the backup, I realized it's from Feburary 27th. The backup >> system that had been running without problems for *years* had stopped >> running after March 1st and none of the current maintainers noticed: since >> the backup procedure didn't generate an error, but was plainly not >> executed, there were no mails about backups failing. On top of that, it >> turns out that the system I have in place to report disk usage problems, >> wasn't delivering messages of the common-lisp.net disk overage either! >> I've restored the database backup from the 27th and we have the backup >> procedure running again. This means that anything stored in the database is >> back to the 27th. MRs, issues, etc. The *repositories* are fine and never >> were in danger! >> >> So far, I've waited to enable the service, because I've contacted the >> #gitlab:libera.chat channel to ask if anything can be done to assure >> consistency between the repositories and the database. So far, the channel >> has remained silent (not just to my question, but to any questions posed). >> I am thinking to restore access on monday night CEST, if no answer appears >> on the gitlab channel, or as much earlier as a usable answer will be >> provided. >> >> >> Let me close off this mail by offering my sincere apologies for failing >> the trust you have put in me and for any inconvenience this may have >> caused. Please report any inconsistencies you run into to admin at >> common-lisp.net so we can work on fixes. Additional controls are being >> worked on to prevent a similar situation in future: "ping" messages from >> the monitoring infrastructure and checks on the off-site backup system to >> check that the weekly full backup (and the daily incrementals) have been >> delivered. >> >> >> -- >> Bye, >> >> Erik. >> >> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. >> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. >> > > > -- > Ray > -- Marco Antoniotti, Professor tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01 DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://dcb.disco.unimib.it Viale Sarca 336 I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY