Now that mail transfer is encrypted: stricter DMARC?
Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:31:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACOoB6j4_UVChTzSOk7-uJMExeVGkN6xpGj=uiuWJkxbv+Tfew@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi,
Since a few weeks now, we're running DMARC for the mailing lists. So far,
we've run with the loosest policy possible ("none"). The other options are
"quarantine" and "reject".
I'm thinking we'll want mail sent using our domain (common-lisp.net),
failing the DMARC checks (failing SPF and/or DKIM), to be quarantined
(moved to SPAM) at the very least. I noticed that fastmail is using an even
stricter policy ("reject"), but moving straight from "none" to "reject"
seems too much (because "reject" prevents delivery; not just moving to
SPAM).
This will affect everybody using an @common-lisp.net mail address with
their own mail server.
Does this affect anybody on this mailing list? Any comments with respect to
the stricter policy?
Regards,
Erik.