Re: Has gitweb lost its CSS?

Jean-Claude Beaudoin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel
Message-ID <CAN3WOFeq+5G8kP_XhRo+m=cTV5BiT_VRRNjejkMhKkJyGn5JYg@mail.gmail.com>
Indeed the link form you suggest do work like a charm and do give the
result the previous (now malformed) link form used to.

I updated mine. Now ASDF has to do the same. I hope the CC to the ASDF
maintainer here above will be enough to get his attention...

Thanks,

Jean-Claude

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Dave Cooper <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> The following pages for example have the apparently malformed gitweb links:
>
>   http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/#downloads
>
>   http://common-lisp.net/project/mkcl/
>
> So I guess the projects need to be notified that the "/project/..."
>  syntax doesn't work anymore. Apparently this "/project/" pattern used to
> work?
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Mario S. Mommer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> where are you finding these links? It is true that they don't work, but
>> they just seem to be malformed. The link you sent,
>>
>>  http://common-lisp.net/gitweb/?p=projects/asdf/asdf.git
>>
>> gives an error. But if I go to http://common-lisp.net/gitweb/ I can
>> click on the asdf link,
>>
>>  http://common-lisp.net/gitweb/?p=asdf/asdf.git;a=summary;js=1
>>
>> and I get something that looks OK.
>>
>> This also works:
>>
>>  http://common-lisp.net/gitweb/?p=asdf/asdf.git
>>
>> Where are the these broken links?
>>
>> Regards,
>>         Mario
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Clo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clo-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Clo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clo-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.