Fwd: Testing GitLab installation & migration nearing completion: steps to cut-over
Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.common-lisp-net.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACOoB6hTmYJoXmANebBpn-4k343P7O9Y-wDdQAUv2-0WH_y_Yw@mail.gmail.com> |
The conversation below may be relevant to the members of this mailing list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Erik Huelsmann <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:57 PM Subject: Re: Testing GitLab installation & migration nearing completion: steps to cut-over To: Robert Swindells <[email protected]> Hi Robert, On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:33 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > "Erik Huelsmann" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > > As some of you have noticed this weekend, we're still working on > migrating > > the common-lisp.net repositories to GitLab. While doing so, a few > e-mails > > have been sent out while they should have been held and deleted on the > > testing system. My appologies if it caused confusion or inconvenience. > > Would it be possible to keep using Subversion for the mit-cadr repository ? > > Yes! *Nothing* is going to happen to Subversion repositories. This migration concerns Git repositories for now, but the bigger trend will impact the following VC systems: CVS, darcs, Git, mercurial (but not Subversion) as laid out in this mail: https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/clo-devel/2015-February/000168.html -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. -- Bye, Erik. http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. _______________________________________________ Clo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clo-devel