Re: FEprogram_error vs FEprogram_error_noreturn
Daniel Kochmański <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.ecl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
They are exported for sake of the transpiled CL code. We could provide such define though, for instance in legacy.h header, if there might be code using it. I would keep it removed though unless somebody complains, then we will add it back in form of define. On 01.07.2017 00:11, Fabrizio Fabbri wrote: > Il giorno 29 giu 2017, alle ore 10:25, Daniel Kochmański <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >>> It seems like one of these should be removed. If so, I can remove one >>> of them and change all of the calls to it. I would say keep >>> FEprogram_error and remove FEprogram_error_noreturn. >>> >> If they do the same then yes, please remove one of them. >> > I'm not sure if that is an internal or is part of the public interface. > > In case of the latter would it make sense to #define the one we are going to remove just to be on the safe side as backward compatibility? > >> Regards, >> Daniel >> >