Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

It would be interesting to hear of a few benchmarks. What observations to
make?

 WASM advocates seem to hold that WASM code
executes fast and efficient.

  How long would one expect (under realistic constraints) a computer system
to take to download a complete
Common Lisp system + Maxima (compiled from Lisp to WASM?) into (say) a
Chrome browser?

  There are many possible benchmarks to compare different features, like
bignum arithmetic, polynomial arithmetic,
input/output, the Maxima testsuite.


On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 11:17 AM Henry Baker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Re: emscripten version of ECL:
>
> You can attempt to build it yourself:
>
> https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/tree/emscripten
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marius Gerbershagen <[email protected]>
> Sent: Jan 14, 2023 9:39 AM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]
>
> It's perhaps worth noting that ECL can be made to run in this way in a
> browser and will officially support WASM in the next release (
> https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/merge_requests/277).
>
>
>
> <snip>

_______________________________________________
Maxima-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss