Re: Branch Version_2_7_0pre
Camm Maguire <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.gcl.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greetings! I don't see why not, there should be no ansi related obstacles remaining. I will look into this once I get the Debian packages going. I also see you posted some very helpful patches for MacOS in the past which I have missed -- thank you! I have a windows and macos virtual box setup locally which I use to test builds as a last step before release. In the old days I had remote machine access but this seems to have disappeared. In any case your work will no doubt be incorporated at that point in the cycle. Thank you again! Reading your post quickly, I would be surprised if the commits you cite caused duplicate symbols. My guess is that gcc changed inline semantics around the same time and we followed. If I recall debian clang did likewise. The -std=gnu89 comment seems apropos. Take care, "Kirill A. Korinsky" <[email protected]> writes: > Any chance to have support of ASDF out of the box? -- Camm Maguire [email protected] ========================================================================== "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah