bug#50609: number overflow
lloda <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Not quite comfortable poking around in the compiler, but find a patch attached. I also found this related bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32644.
0001-Limit-the-range-of-ash-round-ash-count-argument-to-I.patch
(application/octet-stream, 6.1 KB)
From 699919f181ea94ba00d392b49d07ed85e7535fcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Llorens <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:52:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Limit the range of ash, round-ash count argument to INT32 This avoids gmp aborting e.g. with (ash 1 (expt 2 37)). The new limit is such that (ash 1 (expt 30)) is accepted but (ash 1 (expt 31)) throws. * libguile/numbers.c (ash, round-ash): As stated. * test-suite/tests/numbers.test: Test a case known to make gmp abort before. --- libguile/numbers.c | 98 +++++++++++++++-------------------- test-suite/tests/numbers.test | 5 +- 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) diff --git a/libguile/numbers.c b/libguile/numbers.c index 18bd22dbb..1f7785aa6 100644 --- a/libguile/numbers.c +++ b/libguile/numbers.c @@ -5090,6 +5090,8 @@ round_right_shift_exact_integer (SCM n, long count) and moreover that they can be negated without overflow. */ verify (SCM_MOST_NEGATIVE_FIXNUM >= LONG_MIN + 1 && SCM_MOST_POSITIVE_FIXNUM <= LONG_MAX); +/* the practicable limits are smaller */ +verify (INT32_MIN >= LONG_MIN && INT32_MAX <= LONG_MAX); SCM_DEFINE (scm_ash, "ash", 2, 0, 0, (SCM n, SCM count), @@ -5110,35 +5112,28 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_ash, "ash", 2, 0, 0, "@end lisp") #define FUNC_NAME s_scm_ash { - if (SCM_I_INUMP (n) || SCM_BIGP (n)) - { - long bits_to_shift; - - if (SCM_I_INUMP (count)) /* fast path, not strictly needed */ - bits_to_shift = SCM_I_INUM (count); - else if (scm_is_signed_integer (count, LONG_MIN + 1, LONG_MAX)) - /* We exclude LONG_MIN to ensure that 'bits_to_shift' can be - negated without overflowing. */ - bits_to_shift = scm_to_long (count); - else if (scm_is_false (scm_positive_p (scm_sum (scm_integer_length (n), - count)))) - /* Huge right shift that eliminates all but the sign bit */ - return scm_is_false (scm_negative_p (n)) - ? SCM_INUM0 : SCM_I_MAKINUM (-1); - else if (scm_is_true (scm_zero_p (n))) - return SCM_INUM0; - else - scm_num_overflow ("ash"); - - if (bits_to_shift > 0) - return left_shift_exact_integer (n, bits_to_shift); - else if (SCM_LIKELY (bits_to_shift < 0)) - return floor_right_shift_exact_integer (n, -bits_to_shift); - else - return n; - } - else + if (!SCM_I_INUMP (n) && !SCM_BIGP (n)) SCM_WRONG_TYPE_ARG (SCM_ARG1, n); + + if (scm_is_false (scm_positive_p (scm_sum (scm_integer_length (n), + count)))) + /* Huge right shift that eliminates all but the sign bit */ + return scm_is_false (scm_negative_p (n)) + ? SCM_INUM0 : SCM_I_MAKINUM (-1); + else if (scm_is_true (scm_zero_p (n))) + return SCM_INUM0; + else if (scm_is_signed_integer (count, INT32_MIN + 1, INT32_MAX)) { + /* We exclude MIN to ensure that 'bits_to_shift' can be + negated without overflowing, if INT32_MIN happens to be LONG_MIN */ + long bits_to_shift = scm_to_long (count); + if (bits_to_shift > 0) + return left_shift_exact_integer (n, bits_to_shift); + else if (SCM_LIKELY (bits_to_shift < 0)) + return floor_right_shift_exact_integer (n, -bits_to_shift); + else + return n; + } else + scm_num_overflow ("ash"); } #undef FUNC_NAME @@ -5164,34 +5159,27 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_round_ash, "round-ash", 2, 0, 0, "@end lisp") #define FUNC_NAME s_scm_round_ash { - if (SCM_I_INUMP (n) || SCM_BIGP (n)) - { - long bits_to_shift; - - if (SCM_I_INUMP (count)) /* fast path, not strictly needed */ - bits_to_shift = SCM_I_INUM (count); - else if (scm_is_signed_integer (count, LONG_MIN + 1, LONG_MAX)) - /* We exclude LONG_MIN to ensure that 'bits_to_shift' can be - negated without overflowing. */ - bits_to_shift = scm_to_long (count); - else if (scm_is_true (scm_negative_p (scm_sum (scm_integer_length (n), - count))) - || scm_is_true (scm_zero_p (n))) - /* If N is zero, or the right shift count exceeds the integer - length, the result is zero. */ - return SCM_INUM0; - else - scm_num_overflow ("round-ash"); - - if (bits_to_shift > 0) - return left_shift_exact_integer (n, bits_to_shift); - else if (SCM_LIKELY (bits_to_shift < 0)) - return round_right_shift_exact_integer (n, -bits_to_shift); - else - return n; - } - else + if (!SCM_I_INUMP (n) && !SCM_BIGP (n)) SCM_WRONG_TYPE_ARG (SCM_ARG1, n); + + if (scm_is_true (scm_negative_p (scm_sum (scm_integer_length (n), + count))) + || scm_is_true (scm_zero_p (n))) + /* If N is zero, or the right shift count exceeds the integer + length, the result is zero. */ + return SCM_INUM0; + else if (scm_is_signed_integer (count, INT32_MIN + 1, INT32_MAX)) { + /* We exclude MIN to ensure that 'bits_to_shift' can be + negated without overflowing, if INT32_MIN happens to be LONG_MIN */ + long bits_to_shift = scm_to_long (count); + if (bits_to_shift > 0) + return left_shift_exact_integer (n, bits_to_shift); + else if (SCM_LIKELY (bits_to_shift < 0)) + return round_right_shift_exact_integer (n, -bits_to_shift); + else + return n; + } else + scm_num_overflow ("round-ash"); } #undef FUNC_NAME diff --git a/test-suite/tests/numbers.test b/test-suite/tests/numbers.test index 8f644874d..51263f0ac 100644 --- a/test-suite/tests/numbers.test +++ b/test-suite/tests/numbers.test @@ -5466,7 +5466,10 @@ (ash-variant -1 (- (expt 2 1000)))) (pass-if-exception "Huge left shift of non-zero => numerical overflow" exception:numerical-overflow - (ash-variant 123 (expt 2 1000))))) + (ash-variant 123 (expt 2 1000))) + (pass-if-exception "Shift large enough to cause gmp abort in 3.0.7" + exception:numerical-overflow + (ash-variant 1 (expt 2 37))))) (test-ash-variant 'ash ash floor #f) (test-ash-variant 'round-ash round-ash round #t) -- 2.33.1
0002-Avoid-ash-with-arguments-that-might-overflow-in-lang.patch
(application/octet-stream, 1 KB)
From 47f99500e68e40f34a1dab8b0350f32c2ed62d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Llorens <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 16:02:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Avoid ash with arguments that might overflow in (language cps types) Fixes https://debbugs.gnu.org/50609 * module/languages/cps/types.scm (ulsh): As stated. --- module/language/cps/types.scm | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module/language/cps/types.scm b/module/language/cps/types.scm index d3be176bf..87c58d5bc 100644 --- a/module/language/cps/types.scm +++ b/module/language/cps/types.scm @@ -1444,7 +1444,9 @@ minimum, and maximum." (define! result &s64 &s64-min &s64-max)))) (define-type-inferrer (ulsh a b result) - (if (<= (ash (&max/u64 a) (&max/u64 b)) &u64-max) + (if (and + (or (zero? (&max/u64 a)) (< (&max/u64 b) 64)) ; don't even try + (<= (ash (&max/u64 a) (&max/u64 b)) &u64-max)) ;; No overflow; we can be precise. (define! result &u64 (ash (&min/0 a) (&min/0 b)) -- 2.33.1