bug#61095: possible misuse of posix_spawn API on non-linux OSes

Omar Polo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.guile.bugs
Message-ID <2KFIQJHFVA0GP.2GKMWUIGIVCMU@venera>
On 2023/03/30 22:21:28 +0200, Josselin Poiret <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ludo,
> 
> Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Coming next is an updated patch series addressing this as proposed
> > above.  Let me know what y’all think!
> >
> > I tested the ‘posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np’ path by building in:
> >
> >   guix time-machine --branch=core-updates -- shell -CP -D -f guix.scm
> 
> I didn't test, but this LGTM!  Maybe someone on OpenBSD could test this
> patchset?

    % gmake check
    <snip />
    gmake[5]: Entering directory '/home/op/w/guile/test-suite/standalone'
    PASS: test-system-cmds

it seems to work on OpenBSD 7.3 :)

but note that our libc doesn't have posix_spawn_file_actions_addclosefrom_np,
so this is using the "racy" code path.

Just for curiosity, as it's outside the scope of the bug, what's the
reason posix_spawn was used instead of a more classic fork() +
closefrom()?


Thanks,

Omar Polo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.