bug#73188: PEG parser does not support full PEG grammar

I'll continue with the thread privately.

On 2024-12-28 9:30 PM, Bengt Richter wrote:
> Hi Ekaitz and anyone interested,
> 
> Sorry for misunderstandings ;-/
> 
> I thought you have made changes which make the MIT PEG standard [1] available in full,
> and I would like to use that full standard PEG syntax for defining something I have in mind.
> 
> I realize that guile's underlying VM has a bytecode interpretation loop that is dynamically
> jit-optimized, and that this is orthogonal to whether the host system is RISCV or whatever,
> as far as using guile and guix as tools is concerned. (BTW UIAM you have contributed a lot to
> making this bug-free and clean, for which thanks! )
> 
> My interest in RISCV however is as a *target* output language for a compiler I'd like to define
> with PEG for transforming my peculiar DSL source to output RISCV source, then compile it
> to an image for execution by RISCV hardware or the quivalent qemu virtual hardware.
> 
> I'd like to make a tool that can transform any source written in my peculiar ascii/utf8 DSL-syntax
> to a minimal self-contained bootable-in-RISCV-VM-or-HW ELF file.
> 
> I can use the current PEG machinery for testing, but I'd like to avoid debugging things you have fixed :)
> Hence my interest in cloning your repo, so I can start using the MIT syntax [1] and be sure bugs
> I encounter will be *my* bugs and typos and design/coding mistakes ;-)
> 
> Also, if I write do-what-i-want.scm using the peg accessible with guile3,
> the executable will not be a minimal ELF :)
> 
> Thus my interest in the jit code would be to look for code snippets that I might be able to use
> for AHOT compilation. Probably someone is already working on something like that.
> (Anything I think of seems to be WIP somewhere on the internet already :)
> 
> You write about committing your patches, so I was wondering what git repo you are committing into.
> I assume you have a private one on your laptop or otherwise near at hand, but are you pushing to
> some place that I could clone, and then use one of Ludo's magic pre-install incantations to access
> with use-module in a package definition of mine?
> 
> BTW, re guix/guile development funding --
> I am expecting ARM SOCs with RISCV cores to become important in the hacker/maker embedded world.
> 
> Could guix/guile earn extra funding by having an investment coop llc that designs actual FLOSS HW/SW/FW
> and contracts to produce cool devices for profit? (Independent of FSF, and other benevolent sources,
> but allowing non-controlling investment from them).
> 
> Sorry to hi-jack this thread. Please start a new one if interested in exploring anything here :)
> 
> [1] <https://bford.info/pub/lang/peg.pdf>
> --
> Regards,
> Bengt Richter
> 
> On +2024-12-23 23:13:57 +0100, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 2024-12-23 23:04, [email protected] wrote:
>>>       • Late kudos to Ekaitz for this great PEG contribution, especially RISCV,
>>>         which will IMO play a key part in the future of human secure control over machines 🙂
>>
>> I think I didn't understand your message very well, but just as a
>> clarification: the PEG work and RISC-V work are completely independent, one
>> doesn't have anything to do with the other, and the RISC-V work is not
>> merged in Guile yet.
>>
>> The RISC-V work for the Guile JIT (guile already works in riscv without it)
>> is in here:
>> https://gitlab.com/wingo/lightening/-/merge_requests/14
>>
>> Hope this clarifies things.