bug#40008: Backtraces can contain very long strings

Jan Synacek <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.guile.bugs
Message-ID <CAPsXM8VQHXCREX9At-4i2WjCaJGwuFZaJ2WcopsqN7dK7e_F8g@mail.gmail.com>
I have the following backtrace:

Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1736:10  9 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In unknown file:
           8 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 651b40>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    718:2  7 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle…>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    619:8  6 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 74cf00>)))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
   2806:4  5 (save-module-excursion _)
  4351:12  4 (_)
In /home/jsynacek/./git.scm:
     72:0  3 (_)
    61:16  2 (change-spec _ _ "66.33" _ #<output: file 1>)
    48:12  1 (change-release "# We ship a .pc file but don't want t…" …)
In unknown file:
           0 (make-regexp "^Release:(\\s*).*$" "# We ship a .pc fil…" …)

ERROR: In procedure make-regexp:
Wrong type (expecting exact integer): "
<HERE COMES A LOOOONG STRING WHICH IS ABOUT 193000 CHARACTERS WIDE>
"

While this is probably not considered an error, I guess it might be better
to ellipsize strings in errors such is mine that are over a certain length
long. The important part of the backtrace was scrolled away and I got
confused about the string, as I thought it was part of the output and
started wondering why (display ...) keeps the escaped newlines in the
string.

If this is not considered a bug, please, at least consider it an RFE.

-- 
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.