bug#40252: [R7RS] cond-expand in define-library forms
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEYrNrSPYNBgYQ-p84g=Qej_VZ-=P0Thd9YTBov2yGE8n8jhhA@mail.gmail.com> |
*bump* Am Fr., 27. März 2020 um 15:17 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <[email protected]>: > > The following valid R7RS library definition is not handled correctly by Guile: > > (define-library (guile-test) > (export fold) > (cond-expand > ((library (scheme list)) > (import (scheme list))) > ((library (srfi srfi-1)) > (import (srfi srfi-1))))) > > This is what I get: > > $ guile --r7rs -L . > GNU Guile 3.0.1 > ... > > (import (guile-test)) > While compiling expression: > no code for module (scheme list) > > > > Thus, the cond-expand library declaration does not seem to be handled correctly. Other experiments with cond-expand also show strange behaviors: > > (define-library (guile-test) > (export foo) > (cond-expand > (guile > (import (scheme base)))) > (begin > (define foo 42))) > > > (import (guile-test)) > While compiling expression: > Syntax error: > unknown location: source expression failed to match any pattern in form (((begin (define foo 42)))) > > -- > > Marc