bug#40252: [R7RS] cond-expand in define-library forms

Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.guile.bugs
Message-ID <CAEYrNrSPYNBgYQ-p84g=Qej_VZ-=P0Thd9YTBov2yGE8n8jhhA@mail.gmail.com>
*bump*

Am Fr., 27. März 2020 um 15:17 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
<[email protected]>:
>
> The following valid R7RS library definition is not handled correctly by Guile:
>
> (define-library (guile-test)
>   (export fold)
>   (cond-expand
>     ((library (scheme list))
>      (import (scheme list)))
>     ((library (srfi srfi-1))
>      (import (srfi srfi-1)))))
>
> This is what I get:
>
> $ guile --r7rs -L .
> GNU Guile 3.0.1
> ...
> > (import (guile-test))
> While compiling expression:
> no code for module (scheme list)
> >
>
> Thus, the cond-expand library declaration does not seem to be handled correctly. Other experiments with cond-expand also show strange behaviors:
>
> (define-library (guile-test)
>   (export foo)
>   (cond-expand
>     (guile
>      (import (scheme base))))
>   (begin
>     (define foo 42)))
>
> > (import (guile-test))
> While compiling expression:
> Syntax error:
> unknown location: source expression failed to match any pattern in form (((begin (define foo 42))))
>
> --
>
> Marc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.