Re: rdelim: Add new procedure `for-line-in-file`.

Hi Adam,

has this patch been discussed somewhere else?  I'm asking because I have
no context other than this patch.

> From 18485a2b94595ae2239f5dcdeb06d3a80bb04bf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: AwesomeAdam54321 <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 23:48:30 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] rdelim: Add new procedure `for-line-in-file`.
>
> * module/ice-9/rdelim.scm (for-line-in-file): Add it.
> ---
>  module/ice-9/rdelim.scm | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/module/ice-9/rdelim.scm b/module/ice-9/rdelim.scm
> index d2cd081d7..ffa38efad 100644
> --- a/module/ice-9/rdelim.scm
> +++ b/module/ice-9/rdelim.scm
> @@ -206,3 +206,15 @@ characters to read.  By default, there is no limit."
>  	      line)
>        (else
>         (error "unexpected handle-delim value: " handle-delim)))))
> +
> +;;; for-line-in-file [PORT BODY] calls BODY (a procedure with the
> +;;; line from PORT as it's argument) for every line until the
> +;;; eof-object is reached. The line provided to BODY is guaranteed
> +;;; to be a string.
> +
> +(define (for-line-in-file file body)
> +  (while #t
> +    (let ((line (read-line file)))
> +      (if (string? line)
> +          (body line)
> +          (break)))))

It is preferrable to use a docstring instead of a comment.  The choice
of argument names is inconsistent, though.  You're using PORT in the
comment and FILE in the definition.  BODY as a name for a procedure is
also a rather "inspired" choice.

Where is BREAK defined?

-- 
Ricardo