RE: [PATCH 1/1] fport_print: handle ttyname ENODEV

Rob Browning <[email protected]> writes:

> Hmm, just to clarify.  *I* didn't write any of that code, and hadn't
> considered it carefully yet -- I just replicated the existing
> scm_ttyname() code from posix.c, i.e. this just does what we already do
> there.

Oh, and in addition to wondering about using ttyname_r when it's
available, if we did that, or even if we didn't, I could also see moving
the shared code to a shared helper, but I was just starting with a
"simpler" proposal (to avoid the crash).

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4