Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> Fri, 16 May 2025 06:59:30 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.lisp.guile.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes:

> Mike Gran <[email protected]> writes:
>> bootstrapped with the bitrotten guts of what we had before to get back
>> to a working `make check`.  From here, it might be simple to extract
>> the old 64-bit patch and incorporate the Lilypond patch set in whole or
>> in part.  I don't know yet. I haven't tried it.
> …
>> - rlb expressed the importance of ensuring the ABI on Debian versions of
>>   Guile don't change with minor revisions, so I think he'd like to see
> …
>> - janneke indicated that in the past, the *.go files were identical for
> …
>> - the Guix project does cross-build MinGW packages on their CI/CD, so
> …
>> - and spk121 (me) wants Guile to be buildable using the native tools of
>>   Cygwin and MSYS2's MINGW32 and UCRT64 toolchains
> …
>> there. Just a bit more time.  But if another Guile committer wants to
>> champion the Lilypond patchset and push it, that's fine by me. No need
>> to wait on me.
>
> I wish I could champion it, but as I can’t (I have no Windows skills or
> experience to speak of), I’d just like to ask whether there was progress
> off-list.
>
> Also: thank you for championing the inclusion of the patchset!

Did you push your working make check to some branch people can test?

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 1.1 KB)