Re: Guile 64-bit Windows support, redux
Jonas Hahnfeld via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:46:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2025-09-15 at 23:51 +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes: > > > Jonas Hahnfeld <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > On Mon, 2025-08-25 at 21:03 +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > > Liliypond just had a release again, and it would be great if we could > > > > get Guile to a point that Lilypond does not have to patch it anymore for > > > > their Windows-releases. > > > > > > We're patching since a long time, but yes it would be great if there > > > was an upstream release that "just worked" (tm) on 64-bit Windows. > > > > I hope we’ll get there. It’s been my wish for several years now and is > > the reason why I got push-access on the savannah repo of Guile. > > Quick status: in IRC rlb and me decided that I’ll create a PR from the > patches to make it easier to review for people with windows experience > and hopefully get moving again. Is this about creating a "real" pull request at https://codeberg.org/guile/guile ? I saw this link somewhere, but wasn't sure if this is now the "official" development repository for Guile? Was there an "announcement" on the mailing list that I missed? If yes, I would prefer to open the PR myself since it's my patches that have been proposed for a long time. Do you have documentation how the collaboration works at codeberg? Jonas
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRiF4DLRvon1vw5biCcVOmY/6OEDwUCaMkHuQAKCRCcVOmY/6OE D+m9AP0djlFCDVOEIQ7T0x/XjL50I4qDiYGDPhRD+GCIKgBmgwEAkDRqrLIMTZya KxoPJ69oi1wK8sjVx4YP/rxsJuacowQ= =727o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----