Re: Welcoming Olivier as new committer
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Mar 2026 20:01:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | AvatarAcademy.nl |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Olivier Dion writes: > On Tue, 03 Mar 2026, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <[email protected]> wrote: >> Olivier Dion <[email protected]> skribis: >> >>> Having a working version of Guile 3 on Windows is very nice. But, it >>> would be even nicer if bug fixes could be ported to Windows as well in >>> the future (not just some Z version in a blue moon). >>> >>> Which mean, I would like to see if we can try to keep the Windows build >>> working between versions, once we get it worked, says in 3.0.12. >> >> Perhaps =E2=80=9Cwe=E2=80=9D could add a check in =E2=80=98.guix/manifes= t.scm=E2=80=99 that would (1) >> cross-build Guile to MinGW (it=E2=80=99s already there), and (2) attempt= to run >> the binaries with Wine (that=E2=80=99s the missing part)? > > That would certainly be a great way of having a minimal regression > testing before release! Yes! And it's exactly why i was so puzzled that the new MingW cross-build (https://codeberg.org/guile/guile/pulls/22) merged without any such a test, and which is why I submitted https://codeberg.org/guile/guile/pulls/90, which is, as far as I know, the first recipe to actually test that pull request. I'm happy with the effort put in and the progress made, just not so thrilled by the lack of a test or a recipe to reproduce... And then I got a "I personally don't use Guix and I'm not very interested in trying it out.." comment on that. Greetings, Janneke --=20 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE https://AvatarAcade= my.com