What is the policy/attitude towards LLM contributions in Guile?
zyd via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Mar 2026 20:51:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I posted a message to the Codeberg repo[1] asking this same question but I noticed there's also a mailing list. Unsure which is the more appropriate place to ask this, so posting it here as well just in case. ---- Hi, I'm looking over a bunch of Scheme implementations to see how projects contributors and maintainers are responding to the proliferation of LLMs. I don't see anything that resembles an official 'policy' or guideline to LLM generated/assisted/enhanced/based/etc contributions. Are LLM contributions welcomed in Guile Scheme by the maintainers and contributors? [1]: https://codeberg.org/guile/guile/issues/127