Re: rnrs records: shadows previous definition of `dummy-1a78708d3c9406a3'
λx.x <[email protected]> Wed, 27 May 2026 07:19:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 26 May 2026, Olivier Dion <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2026, =CE=BBx.x <[email protected]> wrote:=20 >> SRFI 271* (which may or may not be included in the R=E2=81=B7RS large=20 >> language), and the SRFIs it links to, is likely to be of=20 >> interest.=20 >>=20 >> * <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-271/>, currently a draft=20 > I don't see any mention of hash in the SRFI. I am missing=20 > something?=20 this is somewhat tangential; i am not necessarily talking of=20 hashing, but more cryptographic functions shipped with Guile as a=20 whole. if Guile is going to ship with a cryptographic hash function, what=20 about other cryptographic functions? Are we satisfied with the=20 RNG interfaces provided in core and SRFI 27? whether they RNGs=20 provided are cryptographically secure does not seem to be=20 documented in the manual, at least not explicitly. --=20 =CE=BBx.x (she/they)=20