Re: Unwind-protect
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.guile.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Zx/[email protected]> |
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 04:55:01PM +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote: > Unwind-protect and dynamic-wind are not the same thing. See > > http://www.nhplace.com/kent/PFAQ/unwind-protect-vs-continuations-original.html I know (thanks for the interesting link, anyway :) BTW: doesn't Guile favour delimited continuations these days? How would things change in view of that? Of course, if you're building a generic Scheme library, you'll have to cope with the fact that full continuations are part of the language spec. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZx/CcAAKCRAFyCz1etHa RsYzAJ0TbLNCcEDVGbE1PS4UOS+rAu8y3QCfVkPY3IgVrE5nRGWa4NytOVDr6b8= =nJ0j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----