Re: Coding assistants (LLM) policy

Vivien Kraus <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

Le lundi 17 août 2026 à 10:22 -0400, Olivier Dion a écrit :
>  If you do use LLM, we might never know.  In other words, we rely on
>   the honor system.  If you do however find yourself using coding
>   assistant, you must:
> 
>     - Review all the code yourself (no vibe code).
> 
>     - Ensure that the code is compliant with the licenses of the
>       project.
> 
>     - You must add (or the committer will on your behalf if they
> accept
>       your change) a Signed-off-by tag to your commit to certify the
>       Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO).  See the DCO document
> for
>       the terms you agree to.
> 
>     - The persons signing the commit (contributor and/or committer)
>       take full responsibility for the contribution.
With Anthropic about to implement watermarking to its text output, the
rest of the industry may follow. We do not know much about it, but it
is possible that in the near future, code generated by most LLMs will
encode more or less secret metadata. What do you think about this?
Should the contributor disclose it, try and remove it, make it obvious,
or something else?

Best regards,

Vivien
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.