Re: Coding assistants (LLM) policy

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 03:59:18PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:

[...]

> Some have mentioned (here and on Codeberg) that LLM outputs and
> copyright have no jurisprudence, yet.  Therefore, following the
> precautionary principle, we need to assume the worst scenario.  I think
> that could be in the form of the companies owning these models to hold
> the copyright of the outputs [...]

Given the amounts on bet, and given the current world situation,
this is not as unrealistic as it sounds.

The amounts let 2008's bubble look like small change, so there
are huge forces at play to monetize things before the burst.

Cheers
-- 
t
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCaoPuNAAKCRAFyCz1etHa
RrZLAJ0T8bp2gqY23ZyOZbK3qVIKDN0mIQCeJ1bMWZ6e4ay7gDsXSj/lNHI3DS0=
=UuCE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.