Re: Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable?

> I'm one ILISP developer who has no problem with GPL'ing ILISP. 

As another (of the many) ILISP developers, I agreeable with the change
as well.
 
> I think the usual strategy of sending an email to all listed
> contributors at their last known address saying that "we plan to do
> this unless we here that you object by <some date>," and then making
> the change (assuming no complaints) should work fine.

I like that idea.

Marco, as the lead for this project, what do you think? Do you think
that it is sufficient to send this e-mail to the current SF developers
as well as the original author, Chris McConnell? If you are happy with
this, I'll volunteer to send the e-mail and process the replies.

-- 
       Kevin Rosenberg        |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  http://b9.com/debian.html   | : :' :      The  universal
  GPG signed and encrypted    | `. `'      Operating System
     messages accepted.       |   `-    http://www.debian.org/


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html