Re: Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable?

Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.ilisp.devel,gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> From: Peter S Galbraith <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
>    [email protected]
> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
> Sender: [email protected]
> X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:39:04 -0500
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:39:04 -0500
> X-UIDL: 3)g"!R5=!!Qg:"!ic%"!
> 
> Kevin Rosenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Peter,
> > 
> > Thanks for message. I've forwarded your message to ilisp-devel for
> > their consideration as well as debian-legal. ILISP has been an
> > important part of Lisp development for many years, so it is essential
> > to clarify the issue completely. 
> > 
> > Of course, I think it is the hope of all that ILISP's license can
> > become DSFG compliant.
> 
> Thanks for not getting upset at the messenger.
> 
> I'm surprised that the authors didn't simply start off using the GPL
> since it appears that they wanted the code to become part of Emacs down
> the road.  The best way to accomplish such a goal is to start off using
> the GPL, assign copyright to the FSF (and sign the paperwork), and
> accept patches only when the contributor is also willing to sign the
> paperwork.  It's tedious, but changing licenses later in the game is
> difficult when multiple contributors are involved.

Not only its' tedious.  It is an impossibility for ILISP.

I had the very same discussion with RMS many years ago, when I took
ove maintaince of ILISP.  The impossibility of contacting all the
previous authors and contributors is a major stumbling block.

> It's possible that some people won't see loading Emacs code as loading a
> library.  Emacs is an interpreter after all.  For my part, I think that
> using only Emacs builtins might be okay, but using elisp code crosses
> the line.  Unfortunately, the FSF doesn't specifically say anywhere what
> license elisp code (that load other Emacs code) must use.  Even RMS
> hasn't really thought about the issue.

So.  In the case of ILISP, why not take a pragmatic live and let live
attitude?

Cheers

PS. Note that the Italian attitude toward lawyers is less ambiguous
    that the Anglo-Saxon one.  There is no possible misquote of
    Manzoni as there is of Shakespeare :)

-- 
Marco Antoniotti ========================================================
NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group        tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488
715 Broadway 10th Floor                 fax  +1 - 212 - 995 4122
New York, NY 10003, USA                 http://bioinformatics.cat.nyu.edu
                    "Hello New York! We'll do what we can!"
                           Bill Murray in `Ghostbusters'.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.