Re: Re: Bug#169243: ilisp: Is it even distributable?

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:55:37 -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:

> > I think the usual strategy of sending an email to all listed
> > contributors at their last known address saying that "we plan to do
> > this unless we here that you object by <some date>," and then making
> > the change (assuming no complaints) should work fine.
> 
> I like that idea.
> 
> Marco, as the lead for this project, what do you think? Do you think
> that it is sufficient to send this e-mail to the current SF developers
> as well as the original author, Chris McConnell? If you are happy with

I always tried to (paranoically? :) record in ChangeLog the names and email
addresses of all those who had sent code, even tiny patches, for inclusion
in ILISP. You might also check that file.


> this, I'll volunteer to send the e-mail and process the replies.

I would really appreciate it if you could take care of this. You might also
want to post a message to comp.lang.lisp and other relevant newsgroups,
such as some in comp.emacs.*.


Paolo
-- 
EncyCMUCLopedia * Extensive collection of CMU Common Lisp documentation
http://www.paoloamoroso.it/ency/README


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing 
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte 
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html