Re: Important: ILISP License Change Questionnaire

Kevin Rosenberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.ilisp.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Paolo Amoroso wrote:
> What are the practical implications of this for ILISP developers? I guess
> the copyright information in source files would be changed.

Paolo, I think the issue will be moot. I've received 24 replies which
is less than half of all of the people that I've identified who *may*
have authored code. From http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html:
"...FSF requires that each author of code incorporated in FSF projects
provide a copyright assignment..."

> But I wonder whether the project should be required to use FSF facilities,
> such as CVS repositories, and follow their coding conventions/policies.

It's a good question. I haven't found that this is required, only that
by assigning copyrights the project becomes a "FSF project".

However, copyright assignment appears unobtainable at this time.

-- 
       Kevin Rosenberg        |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  http://b9.com/debian.html   | : :' :      The  universal
  GPG signed and encrypted    | `. `'      Operating System
     messages accepted.       |   `-    http://www.debian.org/


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.