Do the new M-. changes work with CLISP?

I've modified the fsf key bindings and have been testing 
ILISP functionality using those new bindings. During this
testing, I tried out the new M-. changes that are in CVS.
Under CLISP, they don't appear to work. The old M-. support
that is in the ILISP 5.12 release did work under CLISP.

To test, do the following:

1. Create a file "test.lisp" with the following contents:

(defun test ()
  (+ 3 3))

(test)

2. Save and load the file in ILISP

3. Put the cursor on the (test) sexp and press M-. 

4. At the "Edit Definition [test]: " prompt in the minibuffer,
   Press enter to accept the default 

5. The following error occurs:

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "shouldn't have been given type \"any\", for (nil nil \"test\").")
  signal(error ("shouldn't have been given type \"any\", for (nil nil \"test\")."))
  error("shouldn't have been given type %S, for %S." "any" (nil nil "test"))
  lisp-locate-clisp((nil nil "test") "any" t nil)
  lisp-locate-definition-in-file(lisp-locate-clisp [cl-struct-ilisp-defn-spec (nil nil "test") "test" "any" "c:/usr/home/lisp/Projects/test.lisp" nil nil] t)
  lisp-next-definition(nil t)
  next-definition-lisp(nil t)
  lisp-edit-definitions-normal(("COMMON-LISP-USER" "::" "test") "any" nil nil)
  edit-definitions-lisp(("COMMON-LISP-USER" "::" "test") "any")
* call-interactively(edit-definitions-lisp)

I've read through the notes on the enhancement and CLISP 
isn't one of the lisps that it says have been tested 
with the enhancement.

--
Bill Clementson


-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com