Re: Re: Ilisp FSF key binding changes

Hannu Koivisto <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.ilisp.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Clementson, Bill" <[email protected]> writes:

> Why is entering a 3rd control key sequence less awkward then 
> just pressing the key? What type of keyboard are you using that
> makes using a crtl-key sequence easier than just pressing a key?

Given these questions you seem to be missing the key point.  Given
C-c C-q C-a you think of "entering a 3rd control key sequence" and
given C-c C-q a you think of "just pressing the key".  But given
C-c C-q C-a I, and probably Andreas, think "just pressing the key"
(since it's <press control down> <rapidly enter cqa> to me) and
given C-c C-q a I think "release control, press the key".  It's the
release point of control that makes the difference.  When it
happens after cqa, I can sort of interleave it with processing what
comes next, but if it happens in the middle, I have to do it (more)
synchronously.  I guess there may also be the aspect that in
C-{c,q,a} I can think "compile-quux-always" (or from whatever those
letters refer to) as opposed to "compile-quux-<something irrelevant
I just have to remember here and not one letter before>-always" in
the case of C-c C-q a.

So I vote for C-{x,y,z} sequences.

-- 
Hannu


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: If flattening out C++ or Java
code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, 
don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software.
http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.