Re: [Ilisp-devel] SLIME

Nicolas Neuss <[email protected]> writes:

> I would have preferred the option of LEP being supported by the free Lisp
> implementations (CMUCL, SBCL, CLISP, GCL). 

David Lichteblau is working on this for SBCL. He shares code with
SLIME, since Dan is factoring all the SBCL-deep-magic code into the
SB-INTROSPECT library that we both use.

His LEP-for-SBCL is at http://www.lichteblau.com/src.html

> Is LEP too complicated or otherwise bad, so that SLIME became
> necessary?

Absolutely not.


_______________________________________________
slime-devel site list
[email protected]
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel