Re: [Ilisp-devel] SLIME

--- Luke Gorrie <[email protected]> wrote:
> (*) This probably explains why loading inf-lisp
> hijacks all my
> lisp-mode key bindings, instead of being nice and
> using a minor-mode.

I found this comment curious as I thought that you
used only a TCP socket to communicate between emacs
and cl. I had a look at the source and you do require
inferior lisp mode (ILM) and comint mode. What is the
rationale for using both inferior lisp mode and a TCP
socket? Is your intention to entirely replace ILM with
socket communication or will you continue to use ILM
for some things and sockets for others?

--
Bill Clementson

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

_______________________________________________
slime-devel site list
[email protected]
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel