RE: Re: Ilisp-help digest, Vol 1 #167 - 1 msg

> On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 08:03:15PM -0700,=20
> [email protected] wrote:
> > The following (general ilisp) keys are defined in ilisp-key.el.
> > I have tried to keep them consistent with the non-fsf keybindings
> > where possible (with the exception of reposition-window-lisp which
> > conflicted with an existing fsf keybinding).
> >=20
> > Non-fsf   Command                Proposed-fsf
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D       =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > "C-c-TAB" complete-lisp          "C-c C-TAB"
>=20
> I wondered why you suggested changing this one.  The non-fsf binding
> seems quite a good one to me, and it has the C-c prefix.

Yes, on c.l.l., a number of people have said that certain bindings in=20
the default could be carried over to the fsf bindings as well and still
be conformant with the fsf guidelines. The changes suggested so far are:

Non-fsf   Command                Proposed-fsf
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D       =
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"C-c-TAB" complete-lisp          "C-c-TAB"
"M-,"     next-definition-lisp   "M-,"
"M-."     edit-definitions-lisp  "M-."

In addition, the following is probably ok "as-is" since it is controlled
by a separate ilisp variable:

"C-]"     close-and-send-lisp    "C-]"

Thanks for your feedback.

--
Bill Clementson


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf