Re: Problem with shell

Nikodemus Siivola <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:41:36 +0200 (EET)
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.ilisp.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Thom Scanlan wrote:

> I'm trying to use XLisp as an Inferior process.
> I'd prefer to use Tom Almy xlisp+ but I'm unable
> to run any lisp binary under an Xemacs shell.
> I'm running Xemacs 21.4 in an XP environment.

Have you tried doing

  (setq inferior-lisp-program "path/to/your/xlisp")

in ~/.emacs (or the Xemacs equivalent), and then issuing the command M-x 
run-lisp? (This is neither shell nor Ilisp, but probably your best bet.)

Ilisp is currently neither maintained nor developed anymore in the (in my 
opinion) any usefull sense of the word, and I suspect the same applies to 
xlisp+.

Unless you specifically and really need xlisp+ I suggest you replace 
xlisp+ with a modern Common Lisp implementation (eg. Clisp), and Ilisp 
with Slime.

Cheers,

  -- Nikodemus              Schemer: "Buddha is small, clean, and serious."
                   Lispnik: "Buddha is big, has hairy armpits, and laughs."


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click