Re: Uncertainty and Lisa

Paolo Amoroso <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:35:20 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.lisa.general
Organization Paolo Amoroso - Milano, ITALY
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Young, David" <[email protected]> writes:

> Upon request, I've decided to look into adding support for certainty factors

As one of those who suggested this, let me thank you for looking into it.


> most popular representations of cf; since my time is limited, I think I'll
> start with the model described in PAIP and work on that. After that has been
> evaluated by the Lisa community, I'll consider adding other implementations.
>
> If you have suggestions for the programming interface to cf -- new rule
> syntax, representations for cf objects, etc. -- please send them to me.

Here is a sample rule from the MYCIN implementation of PAIP:

  (defrule 52
    if (site culture is blood)
       (gram organism is neg)
       (morphology organism is rod)
       (burn patient is serious)
    then .4
       (identity organism is pseudomonas))

Where .4 is the cf.  I think a syntax like the following is similar in
spirit to PAIP's:

  (defrule name (key*) pattern* => cf action*)


Paolo
-- 
Why Lisp? http://alu.cliki.net/RtL%20Highlight%20Film


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php