Re: LW compiler optimizations
"Yuri Davidovsky (as work at disclosure dot ie)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 14 Jan 2025, at 18:49, Tim Bradshaw (as tfb at tfeb dot org) <[email protected]> wrote: > > I added some more variants since yesterday, and with the best of them LW is not slower than SBCL and neither is slower than C (or than my C): both are about 0.94ns/step on my M1 machine Had a look through the repo, it does look like you put a good deal of time to prove your case. I will give it a go testing it tomorrow, had enough of computers for today. That is, unless I get tangled in the dependencies you have there, but I should be able to test at least some of it. Dbm will be probably quicker to give it a run. _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html